Rich TAkes!

~ a collection of links I found interesting lately ~

Why U.S. high court may uphold healthcare law

The Administration had a very bad oral arguments phase

Handicapping Health Care

Health care wasn’t broken

if it ain’t broke?

Review & Outlook: Liberty and ObamaCare

“Dangerous Dick” Lugar and the Marxist Led “Peace” PAC

let’s hope and pray that voters in the Hoosier State retire Dick this May, VOTE MOURDOCK!

Stunning percentage agrees with Sheriff Joe

close to 50% of Americans are “birthers”?

Lord Monckton: Sheriff Joe, posse ‘right to be worried’

does Monckton have a dog in the hunt?

Immigration records missing for week of Obama’s birth

imagine that!

Continue reading Rich TAkes! March 28, 2012→

1875 Supreme Court Decison, Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 168.

The pertinent text of the decision, concerning the issue of what constitutes a “natural-born” citizen, is as follows:

The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”

Note the key words, “all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also”

I have been slammed by some old friends simply by posting this text from a Supreme Court decision, which would indicate that our current POTUS does not satisfy our US Constitutional requirements of “natural-born” for the office of President, irregardless of where he was born. Obama’s father was a Kenyan, and as such was a British subject at the time of Obama’s birth.

Continue reading Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 168.→